Poster Session 3
Kristen A. Cagino, MD
Maternal Fetal Medicine Fellow
UT Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Myra Kurjee, BS
Medical Student
UT Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Emily Hyde, BS
Medical Student
UT Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Han-Yang M. Chen, PhD
Associate Professor
McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Hector M. Mendez-Figueroa, MD
Associate Professor
McGovern Medical School at UTHealth
Houston, Texas, United States
Suneet P. Chauhan, MD
Director of MFM Research
Delaware Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine at Christiana Care
Delaware, Delaware, United States
Our pilot study noted that in our population, understanding of risk factors/complications (RF/C) and management options (MO) for macrosomia (birthweight > 4,000 g) was poor. We hypothesized that a graphics-based education tool (GBET) would improve knowledge about macrosomia.
Study Design:
Inclusion criteria for our randomized clinical trial (NCTO6281301) comprised of individuals at 18-55 years, with singleton pregnancy delivering at > 36 weeks. After consent, participants were randomized to either routine care or GBET (Fig 1). To assess the knowledge about macrosomia, a questionnaire consisting of 17 questions relating to the RF/C and MO of suspected macrosomic fetuses was administered to eligible candidates. The primary outcome was the overall score on the questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were individual scores on the RF/C (n=11) and MO (n=6). We estimated a priori that 100 participants in each group would provide 90% power to detect a 10% difference in the mean macrosomia questionnaire score (baseline score 56% + SD of 12, alpha=0.05). Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics. Chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables.
Results:
During the study period from Jan to July 2023, 230 eligible individuals were approached and 200 (87%) agreed to participate; of them, 103 received the GBET. Baseline demographics were similar. The majority (42%) of respondents self-identified as Black, 60% were employed, 56% had some level of college education, and 30% lived below the poverty line. There were 41% nulliparous, 67% with a BMI > 30 kg/m2 and 16% with diabetes. The primary outcome was significantly higher in those who received the GBET (70% versus 63%, p < 0.01). The RF/C score was also higher in the GBET group (71% versus 63%, p = 0.01); however, the MO score was similar between the groups (64% versus 67%, p=0.12).
Conclusion:
In our population, a graphics-based education tool improved patient knowledge on the risk factors / complications for macrosomia, but not their management options.