Poster Session 3
Rachel D. Seaman, MD
MFM Fellow
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, CT, United States
Caitlin Partridge, BA
Senior JDAT Analyst
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Lisbet S. Lundsberg, MPH, PhD
Associate Research Scientist
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, CT, United States
Jennifer F. Culhane, MPH, PhD (she/her/hers)
Associate Research Scientist
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Anna Denoble, MD, MSCR (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Obstetric patients with chronic hypertension (HTN) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) may not receive corresponding ICD-10 codes due to missed diagnoses or documentation errors. We aimed to compare (1) healthcare engagement at 6 weeks postpartum (PP) and (2) American College of Cardiology (ACC) HTN staging at 6 months PP between hypertensive patients with and without corresponding ICD-10 codes.
Study Design:
This was a retrospective study of patients delivering within a healthcare system from 2013-2023 with ≥1 prenatal visit. Exclusion criteria were < 2 recorded blood pressures (BPs) at < 20 weeks’ gestation and no evidence of elevated BPs or cHTN/HDP by ICD-10 code. The electronic medical record was used to identify patients with HTN; these were then classified as “BP only” (≥2 BPs of ≥140/90 mmHg at < 20 weeks and/or 20 weeks to delivery discharge without an ICD-10 code for cHTN/HDP) or “ICD-10” (with an ICD-10 code for cHTN/HDP). Demographic characteristics and ACC HTN stages at 6 months were compared between groups using chi-square tests. The primary outcomes - attendance at any PP visit or HTN-focused visit within 6 weeks PP - were compared using multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for significant covariates.
Results:
Of 21,296 patients, 9,833 (46.2%) were identified as BP only and 11,463 (53.8%) as ICD-10. Compared to the BP only group, the ICD-10 group was significantly more likely to attend any PP visit [80.1% vs. 65.6%; aOR 2.0 (95% CI 1.8-2.1)] or PP HTN-focused visit [36.4% vs. 2.5%; aOR 17.3 (95% CI 15.1-19.8)]. Both BP only and ICD-10 patients demonstrated elevated BP by ACC staging at 6 months PP: elevated (13.1% vs 13.3%), Stage 1 (14.7% vs 22.6%), and Stage 2 (2.3% vs 9.4%).
Conclusion: Elevated BP in pregnancy in the absence of an associated ICD-10 diagnosis code is associated with lower healthcare engagement up to 6 weeks PP. Despite this, patients with elevated BPs without an ICD-10 diagnosis of cHTN or HDP remain at risk for ongoing BP elevation for at least 6 months from delivery, highlighting a need for improved recognition and documentation of antenatal HTN.