Poster Session 1
Leah N. Schwartz, MD, MSc (she/her/hers)
Resident, Obstetrics and Gynecology
Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Leela Sarathy, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Barbara H. Chaiyachati, MD
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Julia Reddy, MA
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Eleanor Watson
Wheaton College
Norton, Massachusetts, United States
Aria Armstrong, BA
Rush Medical College
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Christina N. Schmidt, MD (she/her/hers)
Resident, Obstetrics and Gynecology
Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Mishka Terplan, MD
Medical Director
Friends Research Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Sarah N. Bernstein, MD (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Davida M. Schiff, MD, MSc
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics
Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Pediatrics
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Current recommendations from professional organizations for ordering and obtaining consent for peripartum toxicology testing remain broad and best practices for both are lacking. We aimed to describe peripartum toxicology testing practices across birthing hospitals in the United States (US).
Study Design: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed through perinatal quality collaboratives, publicly available birthing hospital contacts, and professional organization electronic mailing lists. The survey captured birthing hospital characteristics and toxicology testing practices for both birthing people and neonates, including indication(s) for testing and consent practices. One response per hospital was included in the final analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses.
Results: Respondents from 219 birthing hospitals across 42 states were included. 81.7% of hospitals reported risk-based testing, whereas 11.4% reported universal testing. Among hospitals employing a risk-based approach, the most common indications for ordering birthing person toxicology testing at delivery included: 1) disclosure of substance use in current pregnancy (96.6%), 2) positive toxicology test in current pregnancy (91.6%), 3) birthing person with signs of intoxication or withdrawal (89.4%), 4) neonate with signs of withdrawal (83.2%), and 5) late or limited prenatal care (80.4%). 69.4% and 28.3% of hospitals reported obtaining consent for birthing person and neonate toxicology testing, respectively; among hospitals who ordered testing without consent, 42.3% and 28.8% reported lack of disclosure for birthing person and neonate toxicology testing, respectively.
Conclusion: Our data reveal wide variations in toxicology testing and consent practices among US birthing hospitals. Given the unique and potentially harmful consequences of toxicology testing in this setting, clearer guidance from professional organizations is needed on clinically appropriate indications for testing and standardized approaches for obtaining consent.